K9s/release v0.30.2 (#2376)

* fix #2370

* Fix #2362

* K9s V0.30.2 release docs

Makefile

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ DATE       ?= $(shell TZ=UTC date -j -f "%s" ${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH} +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:
 else
 DATE       ?= $(shell date -u -d @${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH} +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
 endif
-VERSION    ?= v0.30.1
+VERSION    ?= v0.30.2
 IMG_NAME   := derailed/k9s
 IMAGE      := ${IMG_NAME}:${VERSION}
 

README.md

@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ k9s:
       memory: 100Mi
   imageScans:
     enable: false
-    blackList:
+    exclusions:
       namespaces: []
       labels: {}
   logger:

change_logs/release_v0.30.0.md

@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ k9s:
   # ImageScan config changed from v0.29.0!
   imageScans:
     enable: false
-    # Now figures exclusions ie blacklist namespaces or specific workload labels
+    # Now figures exclusions ie excludes certain namespaces or specific workload labels
-    blackList:
+    exclusions:
       # Exclude the following namespaces for image vulscans!
       namespaces:
         - kube-system
@@ -236,13 +236,13 @@ This is a feature reported by many of you and its (finally!) here. As of this dr
 
 ---
 
-# The Black List...
+# Vulnerability Scan Exclusions...
 
 As it seems customary with all k9s new features, folks want to turn them off ;(
 The `Vulscan` feature did not get out unscaped ;(
 As it was rightfully so pointed out, you may want to opted out scans for images that you do not control.
 Tho I think it might be a good idea to run wide open once in a while to see if your cluster has any holes??
-For this reason, we've opted to intro a blacklist section under the image scan configuration to exclude certain images from the scans.
+For this reason, we've opted to intro an exclusion section under the image scan configuration to exclude certain images from the scans.
 
 Here is a sample configuration:
 
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ k9s:
     noIcons: false
   imageScans:
     enable: true
-    blackList:
+    exclusions:
       # Skip scans on these namespaces
       namespaces:
         - ns-1

change_logs/release_v0.30.1.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ On Slack? Please join us [K9slackers](https://join.slack.com/t/k9sers/shared_inv
 
 ## 🎄 Maintenance Release! 🎄
 
-🎵 `On The twentyfouth day of Christmas my true love gave to me... Bugs!!` 🎵
+🎵 `On The eleventh day of Christmas my true love gave to me... Bugs!!` 🎵
 
 Got to love the aftermath... Thank you all for pitch'in in and help flesh out bugs!! The gift that keeps on... giving?
 
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ Please dial [K9s Channel](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC897uwPygni4QIjkPCpgj
 * [#2368](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2368) Pod CPU and MEM columns are empty in 0.30.0
 * [#2367](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2367) k9s 0.30.0 issue loading plugins
 * [#2366](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2366) List pods of deployment is now impossible
-* [#2264](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2264) k9s 0.30.0 fields and values missed in action in the "namespace view"
+* [#2364](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2364) k9s 0.30.0 fields and values missed in action in the "namespace view"
-* [#2263](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2263) Default 0.30.0 default skin on macOS is no good
+* [#2363](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2363) Default 0.30.0 default skin on macOS is no good
 
 ---
 

change_logs/release_v0.30.2.md

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/derailed/k9s/master/assets/k9s-xmas.png" align="center" width="800" height="auto"/>
+
+# Release v0.30.2
+
+## Notes
+
+Thank you to all that contributed with flushing out issues and enhancements for K9s!
+I'll try to mark some of these issues as fixed. But if you don't mind grab the latest rev
+and see if we're happier with some of the fixes!
+If you've filed an issue please help me verify and close.
+
+Your support, kindness and awesome suggestions to make K9s better are, as ever, very much noted and appreciated!
+Also big thanks to all that have allocated their own time to help others on both slack and on this repo!!
+
+As you may know, K9s is not pimped out by corps with deep pockets, thus if you feel K9s is helping your Kubernetes journey,
+please consider joining our [sponsorship program](https://github.com/sponsors/derailed) and/or make some noise on social! [@kitesurfer](https://twitter.com/kitesurfer)
+
+On Slack? Please join us [K9slackers](https://join.slack.com/t/k9sers/shared_invite/enQtOTA5MDEyNzI5MTU0LWQ1ZGI3MzliYzZhZWEyNzYxYzA3NjE0YTk1YmFmNzViZjIyNzhkZGI0MmJjYzhlNjdlMGJhYzE2ZGU1NjkyNTM)
+
+## 🎄 Maintenance Release! 🎄
+
+🎵 `On The eleventh day of Christmas my true love gave to me... More Bugs!!` 🎵
+
+Thank you all for pitching in and help flesh out bugs!!
+
+---
+
+## [!!FEATURE NAME CHANGED!!] Vulnerability Scan Exclusions...
+
+As it seems customary with all k9s new features, folks want to turn them off ;(
+The `Vulscan` feature did not get out unscaped ;(
+As it was rightfully so pointed out, you may want to opted out scans for images that you do not control.
+Tho I think it might be a good idea to run wide open once in a while to see if your cluster has any holes??
+For this reason, we've opted to intro an exclusion section under the image scan configuration to exclude certain images from the scans.
+
+Here is a sample configuration:
+
+```yaml
+k9s:
+  liveViewAutoRefresh: false
+  refreshRate: 2
+  ui:
+    enableMouse: false
+    headless: false
+    logoless: false
+    crumbsless: false
+    noIcons: false
+  imageScans:
+    enable: true
+    # MOTE!! Field Name changed!!
+    exclusions:
+      # Skip scans on these namespaces
+      namespaces:
+        - ns-1
+        - ns-2
+      # Skip scans for pods matching these labels
+      labels:
+        - app:
+          - fred
+          - blee
+          - duh
+        - env:
+          - dev
+```
+
+---
+
+## Videos Are In The Can!
+
+Please dial [K9s Channel](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC897uwPygni4QIjkPCpgjmw) for up coming content...
+
+* [K9s v0.30.0 Sneak peek](https://youtu.be/mVBc1XneRJ4)
+* [Vulnerability Scans](https://youtu.be/ULkl0MsaidU)
+
+---
+
+## Resolved Issues
+
+* [#2374](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2374) The headless parameter does not function properly (v0.30.1)
+* [#2372](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2372) Unable to set default resource to load (v0.30.1)
+* [#2371](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2371) --write cli option does not work (0.30.X)
+* [#2370](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2370) Wrong list of pods on node (0.30.X)
+* [#2362](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/issues/2362) blackList: Use inclusive language alternatives
+
+---
+
+## Contributed PRs
+
+Please be sure to give `Big Thanks!` and `ATTA Girls/Boys!` to all the fine contributors for making K9s better for all of us!!
+
+* [#2375](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/pull/2375) get node filtering params from matching context values
+* [#2373](https://github.com/derailed/k9s/pull/2373) fix command line flags not working
+
+---
+
+<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/derailed/k9s/master/assets/imhotep_logo.png" width="32" height="auto"/> © 2023 Imhotep Software LLC. All materials licensed under [Apache v2.0](http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)

internal/config/config_test.go

@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ var expectedConfig = `k9s:
       memory: 100Mi
   imageScans:
     enable: false
-    blackList:
+    exclusions:
       namespaces: []
       labels: {}
   logger:
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ var resetConfig = `k9s:
       memory: 100Mi
   imageScans:
     enable: false
-    blackList:
+    exclusions:
       namespaces: []
       labels: {}
   logger:

internal/config/scans.go

@@ -21,19 +21,19 @@ func (l Labels) exclude(k, val string) bool {
 	return false
 }
 
-// Blacklist tracks vul scan exclusions.
+// ScanExcludes tracks vul scan exclusions.
-type BlackList struct {
+type ScanExcludes struct {
 	Namespaces []string `yaml:"namespaces"`
 	Labels     Labels   `yaml:"labels"`
 }
 
-func newBlackList() BlackList {
+func newScanExcludes() ScanExcludes {
-	return BlackList{
+	return ScanExcludes{
 		Labels: make(Labels),
 	}
 }
 
-func (b BlackList) exclude(ns string, ll map[string]string) bool {
+func (b ScanExcludes) exclude(ns string, ll map[string]string) bool {
 	for _, nss := range b.Namespaces {
 		if nss == ns {
 			return true
@@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ func (b BlackList) exclude(ns string, ll map[string]string) bool {
 // ImageScans tracks vul scans options.
 type ImageScans struct {
 	Enable     bool         `yaml:"enable"`
-	BlackList BlackList `yaml:"blackList"`
+	Exclusions ScanExcludes `yaml:"exclusions"`
 }
 
 // NewImageScans returns a new instance.
 func NewImageScans() *ImageScans {
 	return &ImageScans{
-		BlackList: newBlackList(),
+		Exclusions: newScanExcludes(),
 	}
 }
 
@@ -67,5 +67,5 @@ func (i *ImageScans) ShouldExclude(ns string, ll map[string]string) bool {
 		return false
 	}
 
-	return i.BlackList.exclude(ns, ll)
+	return i.Exclusions.exclude(ns, ll)
 }